By Jeffrey Reiman
Grafting the Marxian concept that deepest estate is coercive onto the liberal primary of person liberty, this new thesis from one in all America's most excellent intellectuals conceives a revised definition of justice that acknowledges the damage inflicted by means of capitalism's hidden coercive structures.
Maps a brand new frontier in ethical philosophy and political theory
Distills a brand new notion of justice that acknowledges the iniquities of capitalism
Synthesis of components of Marxism and Liberalism will curiosity readers in either camps
Direct and jargon-free variety opens those complicated principles to a large readership
“In the preface, Reiman says he hopes the publication could be of curiosity to either the proficient layperson and the pro thinker; during this appreciate it succeeds admirably. Written in transparent and lucid prose, the e-book could be a worthwhile source for college students trying to find an creation to Marx and Rawls’s concept on freedom, justice and capitalism.” (Res Publica, 1 March 2013)
“It is probably going that Reiman has reliable replies to those severe reviews. as a minimum, independently of even if his center argument succeeds or falters, the differences, recommendations, and arguments Reiman develops in As loose and as simply as Possibleare of serious value. they should be studied and mentioned via all these drawn to Marx and justice, the genuine stipulations of freedom, Rawls, and post-capitalism.” (Social conception and perform, 1 October 2013)
“As loose and as simply as attainable bargains a truly available advent to 2 significant political thinkers, John Rawls and Karl Marx, to the relation among their respective theories and the paintings of John Locke and Immanuel Kant, in addition to more moderen theories of Jan Narveson and G.A. Cohen.” (Krisis, 1 December 2013)
“Written in transparent and lucid prose, the booklet can be a worthwhile source for college kids trying to find an advent to Marx and Rawls’s inspiration on freedom, justice and capitalism. yet experts also will locate a lot of curiosity right here, too, in view that as we've seen the publication is not only an summary of Marx and Rawls’s notion on those matters, yet an imaginitive try to fuse their insights to create a brand new thought of social justice. even if one is totally confident by means of that ultimate synthesis, Reiman merits credits for trying to exhibit that, whereas the assumption of mixing liberal and socialist has a background, it might nonetheless have a future.” (Res Publica, eight October 2013)
“This is a crucial attempt to reinvigorate smooth liberalism by means of making use of crucial insights from a fading Marxism. Summing Up: hugely steered. basic readers, graduate scholars, and study faculty.” (Choice, 1 September 2013)
A lucid research of Rawlsian liberalism and Marxian thought that indicates the strengths and bounds of every. this is able to be adequate to make the publication crucial analyzing, however the writer is going directly to supply a powerful protection of Marxian Liberalism: an resourceful combination of the proper to liberty with the Marxist critique of non-public property.
—Howard McGary, Rutgers University
Reiman’s intriguing new booklet demanding situations the deliberating political philosophers on either left and correct. Reiman argues that Marx’s critique of the injustice and domination endemic to capitalism has to be mixed with the dedication to person freedom that's the center worth of liberalism. The publication offers impressively transparent and available discussions of refined philosophical rules. it's at the same time an outstanding, unique, and well timed contribution to political philosophy and a great candidate for an undergraduate textbook.
—Alison M. Jaggar, collage of Colorado at Boulder
“…the differences, suggestions, and arguments Reiman develops in As unfastened and as simply as attainable are of significant importance. they should be studied and mentioned by means of all these attracted to Marx and justice, the true stipulations of freedom, Rawls, and post-capitalism.”
—Paul Warren, Social idea and Practice
Read or Download As Free and as Just as Possible: The Theory of Marxian Liberalism (Blackwell Public Philosophy) PDF
Best political philosophy books
Delivering a entire advent to political philosophy, this ebook combines dialogue of ancient and modern figures, including a variety of real-life examples. It levels over an strangely wide variety of subject matters within the box, together with the simply distribution of wealth, either inside nations and globally; the character and justification of political authority; the that means and value of freedom; arguments for and opposed to democratic rule; the matter of struggle; and the grounds for toleration in public lifestyles.
Reconstructing Rawls has one overarching aim: to reclaim Rawls for the Enlightenment—more in particular, the Prussian Enlightenment. Rawls’s so-called political flip within the Nineteen Eighties, stimulated by way of a newfound curiosity in pluralism and the lodging of distinction, has been bad for autonomy-based liberalism and has led liberalism extra widely towards cultural relativism, be it within the guise of liberal multiculturalism or opinions of cosmopolitan distributive-justice theories.
Put up 12 months be aware: First released in 2001 by way of Gerald Duckworth & Co and 2014 in paperback
Aristotle devotes books 8-9 of the Nicomachean Ethics to friendship, distinguishing 3 types: a major variety stimulated by way of the other's personality; and different kinds stimulated by means of software or excitement. he is taking up Plato's concept that one is familiar with oneself greater as mirrored in another's eyes, as delivering one of many merits of friendship, and he additionally sees real friendship as modelled on precise self-love. He additional compares friendship with justice, and illustrates the ubiquity of friendship by means of relating the best way we aid wayfarers as though they have been relations (oikeion), a observe he is taking from Plato's dialogue of affection. in lots of of those respects he most likely prompted the Stoic concept of justice as in line with the usual kinship (oikeiotes) one feels at the beginning for oneself at delivery and, finally, for misplaced wayfarers. Of the 3 commentaries translated the following, that by way of the second-century advert Aristotelian Aspasius is the earliest extant remark on Aristotle; the second one is by way of Michael of Ephesus within the 12th century; the 3rd is of unknown date and authorship. Aspasius concerns no matter if there's just one form of friendship with a unmarried definition. yet he plumps for a verdict no longer given via Aristotle, that the first form of friendship serves as a focus for outlining the opposite . Aspasius selections up connections along with his Stoic contemporaries. Michael cites Christians and attracts from Neoplatonists the concept there's a self-aware a part of the soul, and that Aristotle observed members as bundles of homes.
While humans disagree approximately justice and approximately person rights, how may still political judgements be made between them? How may still they make a decision approximately concerns like tax coverage, welfare provision, legal technique, discrimination legislations, hate speech, pornography, political dissent and the bounds of non secular toleration?
- Escritos políticos (Guerra de Argelia, Mayo del 68, etc. 1958-1993)
- Aristotle and The Philosophy of Law: Theory, Practice and Justice (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice)
- On the Genalogy of Morality (Revised Student Edition) (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought)
- Plato's Sophist: The Drama of Original and Image
- Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution, and Human Rights 1750-1790
Additional info for As Free and as Just as Possible: The Theory of Marxian Liberalism (Blackwell Public Philosophy)
Neither healthier vision nor looking more carefully will enable an individual to correct this mistake and see that what occurs at dawn is not the sun rising above the horizon, but the horizon tipping down. The ideology of capitalism is the illusion that capitalism is uncoercive. This illusion is a mistake of the same type as the illusion that the sun goes around the earth. What corresponds in capitalism to the movement of the sun seen from the earth is the free exchange of wages and labor-power between capitalists and workers.
Ideology, for Marx, means beliefs that people hold that are in some way false so that they deceive people about what is wrong with their society. This can happen even if many or most of the beliefs in ideology are true. The crucial falsehood of capitalist ideology is the denial of capitalism’s coerciveness. With this covered over, beliefs, say about how the market works, can be true and yet function ideologically. So, for example, much of what is found in classical or neoclassical economic theory – say, as found in the writings of Milton Friedman – is true about the way markets function to lower prices and rationally allocate productive resources.
Unlike Marx’s own labor theory of value, the moral version makes no claim to account for prices in capitalism. Nor, of course, does this view hold that there is some mystical substance called value produced by labor, or even (as Marx sometimes seems to hold) 24 Overview of the Argument “congealed labor” that has value. Its claim, rather, is a moral one, namely, that what is morally significant about economic systems is that they constitute arrangements in which people work for one another. Crucial then to the moral evaluation of competing economic systems are the proportions in which people work for one another.
As Free and as Just as Possible: The Theory of Marxian Liberalism (Blackwell Public Philosophy) by Jeffrey Reiman