Hans Bennis, Pierre Pica & Johan Rooryck (ed.)'s Atomism and Binding PDF

By Hans Bennis, Pierre Pica & Johan Rooryck (ed.)

Show description

Read or Download Atomism and Binding PDF

Best nonfiction_3 books

New PDF release: Mayhem in High Heels (Maddie Springer 05)

Maddie's making plans a marriage, yet with a killer at the unfastened, "'til loss of life do you half" could come much prior to she thinks!

Anesthesia for Cardiac Surgery, 3rd edition - download pdf or read online

This finished, cutting-edge assessment of pediatric and grownup cardiac anesthesia brings jointly the entire most up-to-date advancements during this speedily constructing box. this article is meant either as a reference and for day-by-day use by way of working towards and potential anesthesiologists. completely up to date for its 3rd variation, Anesthesia for Cardiac surgical procedure fills the distance among encyclopaedic references and short outlines, offering simply the correct quantity of data to lead trainees and practitioners who take care of cardiac surgical sufferers.

Extra resources for Atomism and Binding

Sample text

The class of its DRS­ (32 ) equivalents. [a)K. is the smallest class r such that: (i) ( a} e r; (ii) for any discourse referents � and y. if (�) e r and Con K contains either � = y or Y = �. then ( y) e r; (iii) for any discourse referents �. • 1n if ( � ) , Con K contains � = Yl e.. ·lDyn then • (iv) for any discourse referents � I . ·. . lin { 11 . , e . . Yn } . • Yn , r and e r; if ( ii i • .. ·. lin ) 1n } E r; and e [1ii 1 K , . Yn e (v) for any discourse referents Ill . lin . YI 'Ym , and Ii.

AND DRT 23 To facilitate a concise formulation of this restriction. PRO i s now formalized i n (34). PRO (final version) If a is a nonreflexive pronoun in a syntactic structure S. carry out the following operations on the immediate DRS K in which a occurs: (a) Introduce a new discourse referent P. of the appropriate atomicity for a, into UK and in ConK substitute p for the syntactic structure consisting of a and its categorial projections. (b) Add to ConK the condition p = Y. where (i) Y is a suitable accessible discourse referent; and (ii) BqP) E [Y]K.

AND DRT (3 1 ) 21 x y X Y z Z W V U BiII(x) Mary(y) X = xEBy Fred(z) x and y said [Y told z about Z] Y=X (i) W = YEBz (H) V = XEBZ (iii) U = xEByEBZ Z=W Z=V Z=U On the analysis in (i). the identity condition Z = W has the same effect as the condition X = Y in (29b). and would be excluded by the restriction needed to account for (29a). However. on the analysis in (ii). since X by definition fails to c-command Z at all (a fortiori within its binding domain). that restriction would not prevent V from being the rcsolving discourse referent for Z.

Download PDF sample

Atomism and Binding by Hans Bennis, Pierre Pica & Johan Rooryck (ed.)


by William
4.4

Rated 4.39 of 5 – based on 16 votes